0151 922 3976
 

Archive for March, 2010

Selecting equipment for work height

Wednesday, March 31st, 2010

What factors do you need to consider?
Working conditions
When deciding which type of equipment is most suitable for a particular task, consider the following:
- slopes or poor ground conditions;
- obstructions, eg steelwork or overhangs;
- fragile surfaces;
- floor loading

Distance to be climbed
Portable ladders are less suitable for higher climbs, particularly if loads are carried. Where possible, provide temporary stairs or scaffold access towers with internal stairs, rather than portable ladders.

Duration and frequency of use
Longer duration or regular jobs generally justify a better standard of fall protection, eg. a tower scaffold, podium step or cherry picker rather than a ladder or stepladder. A ladder or stepladder may be acceptable for short duration tasks, eg. replacing a light bulb when buillding a tower or podium would not be reasonable because the task itself takes only a few seconds to do. But, installing several rows of light bulbs or fluorescent strips in a false ceiling refurbishment may justify the use of a tower or podium steps because the task takes longer.

Distance and consequences of a potential fall
If you have to use a fall arrest system you must make sure there is adequate clearance for it to deploy, so the user does not hit an obstruction or the ground before the fall is stopped. If you have to use nets or airbags they should be located as close as possible to the working level because they do not work as effectively if the fall distance is too great.

Evacuation and rescue
If you have to use a fall arrest system, you must make sure a rescue can be carried out if a worker is left suspended from a roof edge.

Installation and removal
When selecting work equipment look at all the risks, not just those associated with the ‘use’ phase. It may take two or more people to assemble a tower scaffold to get onto a roof and install temporary edge protection, whereas the repair may need only one person on the roof, putting several people at risk so one person can work safely. A better solution would be to use a cherry picker, so one person can perform the task safely from the working platform. This avoids others being put at risk during set up and dismantling.

There are even more risks assosiated with work on a fragile fibre/asbestos cement roof. Where possible, use a cherry picker or tower scaffold to access and repair a leaking skylight. This will remove risks associated with setting up and dismantling work equipment on the roof.

How do you decide what equipment to use?
What is collective protection?
Collective protection is equipment which can protect more than one person and, once properly installed or erected, does not require any action by them to make sure it will work. Examples which prevent a fall include, scaffolds, tower scaffolds and cherry pickers which have guard rails and equipment which minimises the consequences of a fall, include nets and airbags.

What is personal protection?
Personal protection is equipment which protects only the user/wearer and requires action by the individual, such as properly wearing and adjusting it, for it to work. Examples include work restraint equipment which prevents a fall and fall arrest equipment which minimises the consequences of a fall.

Why give priority to collective measures?
Collective measures have several advantages. They are easier to use, protect everyone at risk in the work area and need less effort in terms of maintenance and user training. Personal measures have disadvantages – they require a high level of training and maintenance and they only protect the user.

What does this mean in practice?
If you can provide collective protection you should. For example:
- use a tower scaffold (collective fall prevention) rather than work restraint (personal fall prevention);
- use airbags (collective mitigation) instead of a fall arrest system (personal mitigation);
- however, choose work restraint (personal fall prevention) before airbags (collective mitigation).

Work equipment which prevents a fall.
- Collective
: Guard rails, scaffolding, tower scaffolds, cherry pickers, scissor lifts, podium steps.
- Personal : Work restraint

Work equipment which minimises the consequences of a fall.
- Collective : Airbags, safety nets
- Personal : Fall arrest

Other work equipment which neither prevents or mitigates a fall
- Collective : Ladders, stepladders, kick stools
Personal : Ladders stepladders, kick stools

What else do you need to do?
Make sure people who select, assemble, use and supervise the use of the equipment is regularly inspected and maintained, including ladders and stepladders.

What not to do!

Wednesday, March 31st, 2010

These are just short stories about incidents that have occured in the past!

Factory prosecuted after ignoring 19 notices.
Persistent health and safety failings, which resulted in a total of 19 enforcement notices, have left a chemicals plant on Merseyside with a £55,000 bill.

The HSE decided to prosecute TJ & S Jenkinson after the company, which makes cleaning products, ignored numerous Improvement and Prohibition Notices between September 2005 and October 2008.

Jenkinson failed to control an employee’s exposure to hazardous substances in the powder plant room, didn’t properly train employees who were exposed to hazardous materials, and failed to maintain a forklift truck which had steering problems.

HSE inspector Mark Burton said the company’s failings stretched “over a prolonged period”". Jenkinson ignored the HSE’s official warnings, he said, and “put production before safety”.

“The situation only started to get better after the manufacturer was invited to attend an interview under caution, and advised to take legal advice,” Burton added. “The company then began to appreciate the seriousness of its failings.”

TJ & Jenkinson, of Newton-le-Willows, pleaded guilty to three health and safety breaches: Regulation 7(1) of the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002, for not preventing or controlling employees’ exposure to hazardous substances; Regulation 5(1) of the Provision of Use of Work Equipment Regulations, for its failure to maintain work equipment in good working order; and Section 33(1) (g) of the Health and Safety at Work Act for contravening enforcement notices.

If an IOSH Managing Safely Course had been taken, then it’s very likely that this incident would not have happened. If you’re interested in taking an IOSH Managing Safely Course, simply contact us through our website which is http://www.enrightladders.co.uk/ , or simply call us on 0151-922-3976.

£100,000 fine for project engineer’s factory death.

    An aluminium extrusion manufacturer has been fined £100,000 after an employee who was working on a project to improve safety, was struck and killed by a shuttle car.

    Hydro Aluminium Extrusion admitted failing to ensure the safety of employees, contrary to Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work Act, after 38-year-old project engineer manager Jens Hinirichs died on 2nd November 2006 at its factory near Chester-le-Street.

    The car hit Hinirichs, who was originally from Germany, as he worked in an enclosed shuttle line at the rear of four packing stations where the car ran on rail tracks to pick up finished items and move them to a banding machine.

    The HSE’s investigation conluded that Hydro could have prevented the accident by properly assessing the risks and implementing a safe system for entering the shuttle enclosure.

    “Suitable isolation procedures and systems of work should have been in place to prevent dangerous movement of machinery,” said HSE inspector Zoe Feather.

    On 25th March at Durham Crown Court, Recorder Jonathan Aitken fined Hydro £100,000 and ordered it to pay costs of £13,375.

    If a Risk Assessment Course had been taken, then it’s very likely that this incident would not have happened. If you’re interested in taking a Risk Assessment Course, simply contact us through our website which is http://www.enrightladders.co.uk/ , or simply call us on 0151-922-3976.

    Managing a hidden killer

    Monday, March 15th, 2010

    Enright Access have added a course on Asbestos awareness to our portfolio off courses.
    Why? – this hidden killer is important for all contractors,plumbers,carpenters and facilities management to name but a few who needs to know about it please read this news article on the subject.
    - Remember your safety is our buisness.

    Managing a hidden killer
    October 1st 2009
    Managing asbestos in buildings effectively and efficiently is essential to prevent more people being exposed to this hidden killer, says Richard Edwards
    It is estimated that there is six million tonnes of asbestos in schools, hospitals, shops, offices, factories and even our homes. Recent figures issued by the Health and Safety Executive reveal that every week 20 tradesmen die from asbestos-related diseases through past exposure to asbestos fibres. This amounts to approximately 4,000 asbestos-related deaths every year and academic research shows that this figure could increase to around 10,000 asbestos-related deaths a year by 2015.
    These are shocking statistics and emphasise the need to manage asbestos in buildings effectively and efficiently to prevent more people being exposed to this hidden killer and running the risk of dying in the future.
    Under the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2006, if you are responsible for managing the maintenance and repair of a building, or you are the owner, then as the ‘duty holder’ you have a legal duty to manage asbestos and protect employees. The regulations require the ‘duty holder’ to:
    Find out whether asbestos is present in their buildings, where it is located and what condition it is in Assume that materials contain asbestos unless they can be sure they do not Record their findings Assess the risks from these materials Prepare and implement plans to manage the risks from such asbestos Provide information to anyone liable to come into contact with asbestos There are three main types of asbestos that can be found in premises, which are commonly called blue asbestos (crocidolite), brown asbestos (amosite) and white asbestos (chrysolite) – all of them are potentially hazardous. However, as long as asbestos is in good condition and not disturbed or damaged, there is no risk.
    If building maintenance work is going to be carried out, then anyone involved in the process could be at risk. Workers carrying out maintenance and repair jobs such as cutting or drilling into walls, ceilings or partitions, repairing boilers, laying cables etc. are particularly at risk.
    It is impossible to tell whether a material contains asbestos just by looking at it, as this can only be confirmed by laboratory analysis. However, there are many parts of a building where you are most likely to come across ACMs as follows: Boards around radiators, windows, fireplaces, building columns, pillars etc Sprayed coating on ducts, pipes and some ceilings External cement products such as roof sheets and down pipes Textured coatings on ceilings, walls and stairwells Some ceiling tiles Some water ranks When in doubt, it is better to presume that a material contains asbestos as it can be present in buildings built or refurbished up to the year 2000, although usage began to decline in the 1970s.
    In order to protect your employees and other people from exposure to asbestos fibres, if you suspect that asbestos could be present in a building, there is a standard approach which involves three types of asbestos surveys:
    Type 1 – Presumptive ‘walkthrough’ survey ‘Walk-through’ asbestos surveys are a visual assessment of any suspected areas where asbestos may be present e.g.
    insulation board, ceiling tiles etc. The survey technique relies on the ability of the surveyor to visually identify all materials that may contain asbestos and does not include the taking of samples to confirm the presence of asbestos.
    Therefore, the surveyor has presumed the presence of asbestos using previous knowledge and experience of asbestos in buildings. Moreover, all installations and all inaccessible areas shall be assumed to contain asbestos, until it can be proven otherwise by a Type 2 or Type 3 survey.
    Type 2 – Standard sampling asbestos survey Standard sampling asbestos surveys are the most common form of asbestos survey undertaken and require the surveyor to again identify any installations that may contain asbestos. These installations are then sampled (this may require several samples depending on size and complexity of the suspect installation) and analysis carried out at an UKAS-accredited laboratory.
    This type of survey provides a much more accurate result than just a survey on its own, as it confirms where asbestos is present. It will also give additional information on types of asbestos and concentrations on which to base an assessment of risk.
    Type 3 – Full access intrusive asbestos survey Full access intrusive asbestos surveys extend the Type 2 survey to include investigations into reasonably accessible sealed voids and the fabric of the building. This will include breaking through partition walls, ceilings etc. to confirm the presence or absence of asbestos and normally, this is carried out prior to demolition or major refurbishment works, where significant damage to the building will not be a problem.
    If you need to have any asbestos remedial work carried out, this must be done by trained professionals using proper precautions and if working with ‘high risk’ materials, such as sprayed asbestos, then a licensed contractor must be used. Even work on materials such as asbestos cement, textured coatings or vinyl tiles has to be undertaken by a fully trained contractor.
    Finally, it is advised that where asbestos materials have been found in the past, then an appropriate monitoring regime be implemented. In addition, where changes have occurred it is suggested that the Building Asbestos Register, Management Plan and Location Plans are updated.
    It is worth remembering that whilst exposure to asbestos containing materials can prove to be a killer, if it is in good condition and unlikely to be disturbed or damaged, it is usually safer to leave it where it is and manage it effectively.
    Richard Edwards is a director at Safety Management & Monitoring Services (SM&MS)